The Emperor Now Has Clothes

posted Sunday, 17 February 2008
 

Introducing a New Measure of Customer Loyalty and Organic Growth for Retailers:  Comp CustomersTM

 

For too long, America's leading retailers and the investment analysts who track them have held "Comp Sales" (also known as "same-store-sales") as a sacrosanct measurement of performance.  The measure is expressed as the percentage change in revenue on a store-for-store, or comparable basis and certainly an indicator of retailer health. 

 

As if to call the emperor naked, over the last year or so, more and more retailers have elected to either not report these numbers or to report them less frequently.  They cite that the number is either over-rated as an indicator or too short-term in nature.  While it might be both, the real shortcoming is that it presents a shallow perspective on how the business is doing.

 

So, Home Depot pushed back.  So did Starbucks and Bebe Stores, Charming Shoppes, Dress Barn, Guess, Gymboree, New York & Company and Talbots.    Yet despite what these retailers are refusing to report publicly, comp sales are the key number that these companies look at internally on a daily basis!  The emperor is still in the buff.

 

So much for Sarbanes-Oxley and company transparency.

 

There's nothing inherently wrong with the "Comp Sales" metric.  So what's wrong?  If Home Depot and Starbucks are right and "comp sales" is not the key metric, what is?  Even Eddie Lampert, the hedge fund manager controlling what is left of legendary Sears, thinks there is a better metric (though he doesn't say what it is!).


Yet no one is reporting one.

 

Consistent with the way so many companies in the US and around the world manage their business, the traditional comp sales metric is missing the point.  If you think about what drives store-level (and ultimately all) sales, it's very simple:  Customers. 

 

Perhaps the most important measure of a company's organic growth and customer loyalty is not (just) comparable store sales, but comparable Customer sales, or Comp CustomersTM.  It's a metric we use when measuring customer loyalty and assessing the opportunity for loyalty marketing for a given business.

 

Consider that a company's customers are its true revenue-producing assets and thus just like stocks in a portfolio.  If those customers spend more, they appreciate in value and the portfolio goes up in value, the same way as if individual stocks increase in value. The other way to grow the portfolio, of course, is to add capital, or in this illustration, acquire new customers.

 

Just as any mutual fund or hedge fund is judged by the returns its investors receive, companies are ultimately rewarded the same way.  The better they are able to grow the value of their customers, the more the company will grow, with or without acquisition.  This organic growth is what commands a premium from investors.

 

Without growing existing customers, new customer acquisition is simply replacing lost revenue, rather than being true organic growth.  When existing customers are growing, acquisition drives even higher rates of growth.  When you consider how much more expensive it is to acquire rather than retain an existing customer, you understand the true importance of a metric like Comp Customers.

 

A few weeks ago Starbucks' Chairman and CEO Howard Schultz declared that the company would no longer report comp sales, rationalizing that the company had been too focused on improving same-store sales rather than the customer experience.  According to reports, Starbucks plans to introduce new quantitative metrics beginning in Q2.  It will be interesting to see what these metrics will be.

 

This concept does not just apply to retailers.  It's really appropriate to any business with customers (and what businesses don't have customers?!?). Maybe we'll see hotel companies report REVPC (revenue per customer) instead of REVPAR (revenue per available room)? 

 

While there are definite challenges in developing Comp Customer reporting, the value from these data and information is more than worth the effort.

 

It is our expectation that as more companies realize the value of identifying and engaging customers in order to build those relationships, there will be some leading companies willing to go out to the public and report Comp Customers, the same way they report other key business performance metrics, like store comps.

(c) 2008 rDialogue LLC All rights reserved.

 

tags:                    

links: digg this    del.icio.us    technorati    reddit

AddThis Social Bookmark Button




1. Tres Tronvold left...
Thursday, 27 March 2008 12:17 am

If you run a loyalty program comp customer sales is good metric. And one that is easy to track. I’ve used this with several loyalty clients.

It’s a pretty simple analysis, a good data analyst can write the query and the calculation in a day

Simply put the metric works like this. 1 Go back 24 months in the database (e.g to March 1 2006) 2. Identify all the program members on that date 3. Pull that list of program members 4. For each member on this list determine the total spend (and /or) transactions from March 1. 2006 to February 28, 2007 5. For each member on that list in step 3, do the same determine the total spend (and /or) transactions from March 1. 2007 to February 29th 2008 6. Calculate the delta (+/-) between 2007 and 2008 for each customer 7. If the sum of the delta is positive; then comp customer sales have increased (and the program is working). If the sum of the delta is negative; comp customer sales have decreased (the program isn’t working) 8. Additionally count the number of customers with negative and positive deltas. That gives you a sense of if you are increasing spend with more customers than you are losing spend from

It’ s a pretty straight forward metric, that management will understand.